Collective law-making process - Revision history

Hoc at 15:31, 27 March 2022

2022-03-27T15:31:07Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:31, 27 March 2022
Line 82:		Line 82:
	=== Agree, prioritize ===		=== Agree, prioritize ===

	* [https://citizentalk.ch/ citizentalk.ch]		* [https://adhocracy.plus adhocracy.plus]
			*[https://citizentalk.ch/ citizentalk.ch]
	* [https://decidim.org/ decidim.org]		* [https://decidim.org/ decidim.org]
	* [https://democraciaos.org/ democracyos.org]		* [https://democraciaos.org/ democracyos.org]

Hoc at 15:27, 27 March 2022

2022-03-27T15:27:12Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:27, 27 March 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
			Subpage of [[Collective law-making]]

	== Methodologies for participatory law-making ==		== Methodologies for participatory law-making ==

Line 47:		Line 49:

	== Comparison ==		== Comparison ==
	* legal ~~paradigms~~		* legal paradigm
	* ~~benefit of~~ random selection → get people that would usually not contribute		*scope
			*steps
			*deliverables
			*resources: competencies, time, material, funds
			* benefits and limits
			**random selection → get people that would usually not contribute
			**languages
			**authentication
			*examples

	== ~~Research groups~~ ==		== Groups ==

	* [https://www.citizencyberlab.org/ Citizen Cyber Lag] (Geneva)		=== Research ===
			*[https://www.citizencyberlab.org/ Citizen Cyber Lag] (Geneva)
	* [https://www.dsi.uzh.ch/en.html Digital Society Initiative] (Zürich)		* [https://www.dsi.uzh.ch/en.html Digital Society Initiative] (Zürich)
	* [https://www.ta-swiss.ch/ TA Swiss]		* [https://www.ta-swiss.ch/ TA Swiss]
	* [https://www.zdaarau.ch/en/ Zentrum für Demokratie] (Aarau)		* [https://www.zdaarau.ch/en/ Zentrum für Demokratie] (Aarau)

			=== Funding ===

			* [https://prototypefund.opendata.ch/ Prototype Fund]

	== Software ==		== Software ==

Hoc at 15:17, 27 March 2022

2022-03-27T15:17:23Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:17, 27 March 2022
Line 62:		Line 62:

	* [https://prototypefund.opendata.ch/project/baloti/ Balotti]		* [https://prototypefund.opendata.ch/project/baloti/ Balotti]
			*[https://campusdemokratie.ch/fr campusdemokratie.ch]
	* [https://www.nedao.ch/ nedao.ch] (Neuchâtel)		* [https://www.nedao.ch/ nedao.ch] (Neuchâtel)

Hoc: /* Global view of process */

2022-03-27T15:15:42Z

Global view of process

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-== Global view of process ==
+== Methodologies for participatory law-making ==
 === Citizen panel, in presence ===
@@ Line 41: / Line 41: @@
 * the metabolic cell transmits the voted proposal to a parliamentary group
-=== HOC ===
+=== houseofcommons.ch ===
-== Analysis ==
+* Law as an evolving commons of glocal customs – collectively defining the rules that affect us
 * legal paradigms
 * benefit of random selection → get people that would usually not contribute
 == Dissemination ==

Hoc at 14:51, 27 March 2022

2022-03-27T14:51:08Z

@@ Line 22: / Line 22: @@
 === Plebean republic ===
-[[File:Plebean republic from Camila Vergara.png|thumb|Plebean republic from Camila Vergara]]
+[[File:Plebean republic from Camila Vergara.png|thumb|Plebean republic from Camila Vergara]]Plebeian institutions allowing for the direct participation of all adult residents in deliberation and public judgment are foundational to free government; equal liberty for all residents cannot be guaranteed without them.
 * The Plebeian Branch is to be composed of two basic institutions:
 ** A decentralized network of local assemblies of residents (see section II).

Hoc at 14:04, 27 March 2022

2022-03-27T14:04:38Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:04, 27 March 2022
Line 22:		Line 22:

	=== Plebean republic ===		=== Plebean republic ===
			[[File:Plebean republic from Camila Vergara.png\|thumb\|Plebean republic from Camila Vergara]]
			"This new political infrastructure for the common people needs to allow for the exercise of a constituent power able to create laws and institutions aimed at liberty, as well as to punish those who, by engaging in political corruption, have betrayed the republic."

			"excluding those who have the ability to formally exert power ''over'' others and unduly influence the creation of law and policy—for example, public officials and their staff, lobbyists, judges, military commanders, and religious leaders— would establish a strictly ''political'' division between those who rule and those who do not. "

			"Luxemburg’s insights on the need for the self-emancipation of the workers through political action, and Arendt’s argument for a space in which individuals can engage in action and new beginnings as a necessary condition for political liberty"

			"Following Condorcet’s radical inclusiveness, every adult residing for one year in a particular district would be eligible to attend and vote"

			"If each assembly has in average six hundred active members (Condorcet recommends between 450 and 900) this would mean that there would be several assemblies even in small towns, which would enable assemblies to ef- fectively channel diversity even within specific communities, allowing for a more engaged, less polarized citizenry, especially in regions divided across ethnic and religious lines"

			==== Key rules ====

			* The Plebeian Branch is to be composed of two basic institutions:
			** A decentralized network of local assemblies of residents (see section II).
			** A Tribunate—an office aimed at enforcing motions approved by the network of assemblies, and at fighting political corruption.
			* The total aggregation of local assemblies is the sovereign subject of the republic; a decision reached in the majority of assemblies is the legitimate will of the people, and all branches of government must yield to it and properly enforce it.
			* The Plebeian Branch is to be funded by a national tax collected for the sole and direct purpose of funding all the costs associated with the operations of local assemblies and Tribunate offices, and their appropriate exercise of constitutional powers.
			* All branches of government—Executive, Legislative, and Judicial— are to obey decisions reached by the Plebeian Branch.

	=== Legislative theater ===		=== Legislative theater ===

Hoc at 13:48, 27 March 2022

2022-03-27T13:48:13Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:48, 27 March 2022
Line 5:		Line 5:
	* Oregon		* Oregon
	* Massaschussets		* Massaschussets
	* Sion		*Eupen (Belgium)
			* Sion/Sitten
	** Methodology		** Methodology
	** 20-50 citizens randomly selected with municipality from an official electors list		** 20-50 citizens randomly selected with municipality from an official electors list
	*** 2000 letters of invitation sent, 200 positive answers, random selection of 20 participants using a software to ensure representativity (age, political view, sex, income level) + 20 reserve (180 left)		*** 2000 letters of invitation sent, 200 positive answers, random selection of 20 participants using a software to ensure representativity (age, political view, sex, income level) + 20 reserve (180 left)
	*** 2 x 2 days		*** 2 x 2 days
	*** 500.– fees reimbursed		*** 500.– fees reimbursed
	* Support: facilitators, technique (microphones, ...), copies (proposals documentation, ...) legal experts (terminologies, ...), catering, ...		* Support: facilitators, technique (microphones, ...), copies (proposals documentation, ...) legal experts (terminologies, ...), catering, ...

Hoc at 13:45, 27 March 2022

2022-03-27T13:45:54Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:45, 27 March 2022
Line 22:		Line 22:
	=== Plebean republic ===		=== Plebean republic ===

	=== ~~FRQ~~ ===		=== Legislative theater ===
			Participatory theater for people to create laws<ref>Boal A. Legislative Theatre. Using performance to make politics. Routledge 1999. https://www.routledge.com/Legislative-Theatre-Using-Performance-to-Make-Politics/Boal/p/book/9780415182416</ref> → [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4xx-CHhzR2s video]

	~~=== Legislative~~ theater ~~===~~		* the joker asks: if you had the ability to create a law, what would it be?
			* a scene of oppression is played (theater-forum)
			* the audience writes down proposals which are passed on to a metabolic cell composed of an activist, a parliamentarian and a lawyer specialised in the theme
			* the metabolic cell synthesises the notes and describes the laws that already exist, and makes 3-4 proposals for amendments or new laws
			* at the end of the stage, the metabolic cell presents its results to the audience
			* the audience debates the results and votes
			* the metabolic cell transmits the voted proposal to a parliamentary group

	=== HOC ===		=== HOC ===

	== Analysis ==		== Analysis ==

			* legal paradigms
			* benefit of random selection → get people that would usually not contribute

	== Dissemination ==		== Dissemination ==

Hoc: Created page with "== Global view of process == === Citizen panel, in presence === * Oregon * Massaschussets * Sion Methodology 20-50 citizens randomly selected with municipality from an official electors list * 2000 letters of invitation sent, 200 positive answers, random selection of 20 participants using a software to ensure representativity (age, political view, sex, income level) + 20 reserve (180 left) * 2 x 2 days *** 500.– fees reimbursed * Support: facilitators, tec..."

2022-03-27T13:24:58Z

Created page with "== Global view of process == === Citizen panel, in presence === * Oregon * Massaschussets * Sion ** Methodology ** 20-50 citizens randomly selected with municipality from an official electors list *** 2000 letters of invitation sent, 200 positive answers, random selection of 20 participants using a software to ensure representativity (age, political view, sex, income level) + 20 reserve (180 left) *** 2 x 2 days *** 500.– fees reimbursed * Support: facilitators, tec..."

New page

== Global view of process ==

=== Citizen panel, in presence ===

* Oregon
* Massaschussets
* Sion
** Methodology
** 20-50 citizens randomly selected with municipality from an official electors list
*** 2000 letters of invitation sent, 200 positive answers, random selection of 20 participants using a software to ensure representativity (age, political view, sex, income level) + 20 reserve (180 left)
*** 2 x 2 days
*** 500.– fees reimbursed
* Support: facilitators, technique (microphones, ...), copies (proposals documentation, ...) legal experts (terminologies, ...), catering, ...

=== Liquid democracy, online ===

* selection of 2000 citizens
* give access to a platform where they can make proposals and vote
* list of important topics selected by a public authority
* then a citizen panel is organized for each topic

=== Plebean republic ===

=== FRQ ===

=== Legislative theater ===

=== HOC ===

== Analysis ==

== Dissemination ==