Difference between revisions of "Health and law-making: collectively re-creating narratives"

From Wiki houseofcommons.ch
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 4: Line 4:


== Blurb ==
== Blurb ==
Healing and Law Making: Re-Creating Narratives
What is health? A series of behaviours to follow, or a process of defining the rules that affect us?


What is the law? A book of rules to comply to, or a process to collectively agreeing on rules that can bring out the best of society? Is knowledge owned by third-party experts or is it emerging from the group? Does innovation require private resources, or is access to resources is a fundamental right?
What is the law? A book of rules to comply to, or a process of collectively agreeing on rules that can bring out the best of society?


During this participatory workshop, we will collectively reflect on the co-creation of health and law.
During this participatory workshop, we will collectively reflect on the narratives behind health and law.
 
 
Is knowledge owned by third-party experts or is it emerging from the group? Does innovation require private resources, or is access to resources is a fundamental right?


== Proposal ==
== Proposal ==

Revision as of 21:28, 21 February 2022

On March 10 2022, from 13:30 to 15:00 CET, an online workshop will be organized by the International Association for the Study of the Commons.

This event is part of a colloquia series "dedicated to the policy issues related to the commons and importance of bringing the commons discussion to policy makers' attention in Europe & CIS and for engaging our community in a wider policy dialogue."

Blurb

What is health? A series of behaviours to follow, or a process of defining the rules that affect us?

What is the law? A book of rules to comply to, or a process of collectively agreeing on rules that can bring out the best of society?

During this participatory workshop, we will collectively reflect on the narratives behind health and law.


Is knowledge owned by third-party experts or is it emerging from the group? Does innovation require private resources, or is access to resources is a fundamental right?

Proposal

Content (draft)

  • Worldviews about the Law
    • a book of rules to comply to → Napoleon civil code (post-positivism, universalism)
    • a process of collectively agreeing on the rules that bring out the best of society → indigenous customs (social constructivism, contextual)
  • Origins in Education
    • Knowledge owned by third-party experts → hierarchy, state vs market
    • Knowledge emerging from the group → self-organization, commons
  • Narratives about the Social Contract
    • Innovation requires private resources → intellectual property, exclusion
    • Access to resources is a fundamental right → participatory governance, pluralism (Rodotà, Italy Supreme Court)

Approach

  • Emergence of participants' knowledge on the topic enriched by inputs from experts.

References

Further readings

People

Participants

  • ...

Facilitators

  • Fabio Balli, IUC Turin, Italy
  • very short bio of max 2 sentences about the key affiliation and research interest

Series hosts