Difference between revisions of "Health and law-making: collectively re-creating narratives"

From Wiki houseofcommons.ch
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(new page)
 
Line 5: Line 5:
== Proposal ==
== Proposal ==


=== Content ===
=== Content (draft) ===


* Legal paradigms: Law as a book of rules to comply to (Napoleon civil code) vs law as the process of collectively agreeing on the rules that bring out the best of the commons.
* Worldviews about the Law
* Education: self-determination vs third-party expertise
**a book of rules to comply to → post-positivist → Napoleon civil code
* Rodotà and Supreme Court Decision
**a process of collectively agreeing on the rules that bring out the best of the commons → constructivist → indigenous customs
* Origins in Education
**Knowledge owned by third-party experts → hierarchy, state vs market
**Knowledge emerging from the group → self-organization, commons
* Narratives about the Social Contract
**Innovation requires private resources → intellectual property, exclusion
**Access to resources is a fundamental right which requires participatory governance (Rodotà, Italy Supreme Court)


=== Approach ===
=== Approach ===
Line 21: Line 27:
* Capra F, Mattei U. [https://www.bkconnection.com/books/title/the-ecology-of-law The Ecology of Law: Toward a legal system in tune with Nature and Community]. Berrett-Koehler 2015.  
* Capra F, Mattei U. [https://www.bkconnection.com/books/title/the-ecology-of-law The Ecology of Law: Toward a legal system in tune with Nature and Community]. Berrett-Koehler 2015.  
* Falkvinge R. [https://falkvinge.net/files/2013/04/Swarmwise-2013-by-Rick-Falkvinge-v1.1-2013Sep01.pdf Swarmwise. The tactical manual to changing the world]. CreateSpace 2013.
* Falkvinge R. [https://falkvinge.net/files/2013/04/Swarmwise-2013-by-Rick-Falkvinge-v1.1-2013Sep01.pdf Swarmwise. The tactical manual to changing the world]. CreateSpace 2013.
*Italian Court of Cassassion. [https://www.labsus.org/wp-content/uploads//images/M_images/sentenza3811.doc Blue Valley Srl vs Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti, Ministero dell'Economia e delle Finanze]. 2011.
*Italian Ministry of Justice. [https://www.giustizia.it/giustizia/it/mg_1_12_1.wp?contentId=SPS47617 Commissione Rodotà - per la modifica delle norme del codice civile in materia di beni pubblici]. 2007.
* Knoepfel P, Schweizer R. [https://doi.org/10.4000/books.pacific.330 Le local et le global : quatre défis de la codification du droit foncier dans le cadre du processus de rédaction du code civil suisse de 1907]. In Ponsonnet M, Travési C. Les conceptions de la propriété foncière à l'épreuve des revendications autochtones : possession, propriété et leurs avatars. Pacific-Credo 2015.
* Knoepfel P, Schweizer R. [https://doi.org/10.4000/books.pacific.330 Le local et le global : quatre défis de la codification du droit foncier dans le cadre du processus de rédaction du code civil suisse de 1907]. In Ponsonnet M, Travési C. Les conceptions de la propriété foncière à l'épreuve des revendications autochtones : possession, propriété et leurs avatars. Pacific-Credo 2015.
* Vercellone A. [https://iris.unito.it/retrieve/handle/2318/1742871/620624/cardozo%20commons.pdf The italian experience of the commons: rithg to the city, private property, fundamental rights]. The Cardozo Electronic Law Bulletin 2020.  
* Laugeri M. [https://www.changementemergent.ch/fr/cles-dialogue Les clés du dialogue hiérarchique]. InterEditions 2015.
*Vercellone A. [https://iris.unito.it/retrieve/handle/2318/1742871/620624/cardozo%20commons.pdf The italian experience of the commons: rithg to the city, private property, fundamental rights]. The Cardozo Electronic Law Bulletin 2020.  


=== Further readings ===
=== Further readings ===

Revision as of 18:03, 31 January 2022

On March 10 2022, from 13:30 to 15:00 CET, an online workshop will be organized by the International Association for the Study of the Commons.

This event is part of a colloquia series "dedicated to the policy issues related to the commons and importance of bringing the commons discussion to policy makers' attention in Europe & CIS and for engaging our community in a wider policy dialogue."

Proposal

Content (draft)

  • Worldviews about the Law
    • a book of rules to comply to → post-positivist → Napoleon civil code
    • a process of collectively agreeing on the rules that bring out the best of the commons → constructivist → indigenous customs
  • Origins in Education
    • Knowledge owned by third-party experts → hierarchy, state vs market
    • Knowledge emerging from the group → self-organization, commons
  • Narratives about the Social Contract
    • Innovation requires private resources → intellectual property, exclusion
    • Access to resources is a fundamental right which requires participatory governance (Rodotà, Italy Supreme Court)

Approach

  • Emergence of participants' knowledge on the topic enriched by inputs from experts.

References

Further readings

People

Participants

  • ...

Facilitators

  • Fabio Balli, IUC Turin, Italy
  • very short bio of max 2 sentences about the key affiliation and research interest

Series hosts