Healing Communities: PhD thesis

From Wiki houseofcommons.ch
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Overview

Title: Healing Communities. What if we collectively had the capacity to overcome any crisis in a matter of days? A method for teams of teams to: listen to each other, agree on priorities, put in commons resources, create few but essential and freely adaptable solutions.

Author: Fabio Balli

Supervisors

Institution: Concordia University, Tiohtià:ke / Montreal, Canada

Programme: Individualised PhD in Social Science, a program "to promote innovative and creative approaches to issues that are outside the normal boundaries of investigation"

Methodology: creation-as-research, that is "the elaboration of projects where creation is required in order for research to emerge. [...] The ‘results’ produced also include the creative production that is entailed, as both a tracing-out and culminating expression of the research process. [...] Knowledge is produced as creative work, and not simply through their analysis and interpretation. It is in this sense that such creative work can be understood as a strong form of intervention, contributing to knowledge in a profoundly different way from the academic norm”.

Ethics: participatory action research ethics, that is the duty, as a privileged person, to generate value for the community.

Funding: Concordia University (C$ 67K), Quebec bursaries (33K) – see value accounting regarding project funding.

Accessibility: Many elements of research were published in open access, see below. Thesis to be published under a CC BY-SA licence in editable LaTeX format.

Thesis

Structure of the thesis

Part Chapter
Compliance

PhD abstract Résumé du PhD

Acknowledgments

Co-authored contributions

Table of contents

List of figures

List of tables

Glossary

I. Introduction 1. Journey to the PhD

2. Research context and methodologies

3. Some theory on the commons

II. Breathing freely: creation-as-research 4. Commoning across disciplines

5. Commoning across territories

6. Commoning across commons

III. Four levers for solidarity-driven ecosystems 7. Bringing diverse people together for ludic events to overcome loneliness

8. Generating collective value to overcome material scarcity

9. Facilitating agreements across teams of teams to overcome power plays

10. Revisiting collective narratives to break free from self-servitude

IV. How thousands people could end misery within weeks 11. Festival ’taking care together’

12. Solving collective crises within hours

13. Regaining joy in our daily lives: a reflection

V. Closing and references 14. Bridge to the future

References

Index of people

Index of universities

Index of organizations and projects

Core outcomes

On co-creation

On research

Book chapters

Articles

Other communications

Timeline of creation-as-research

Period Focus Detail Research project
1 Sept 2015 Preparation Meetings with supervisors to build my committee.
16 Sept 2015 Application Application submitted. → v1. Question: How does personal growth (emerging group regulation) and collaborative production (peer work released under commons licence) affect individuals in their optimal experience (flow) and autonomy, and organizations in their integrity and societal impact?
20 Nov 2015 Admission Admitted in MA as previous graduate studies are not acknowledged as research with option to fast-track and have credits transfered after courses are done.
Jan 2016 to Aug 2017 Coursework MA and research
  • Global futures
  • Social economy and impact (commons)
  • Experiential learning
  • Participatory action research
  • Participatory design of games for health
  • Mixed studies reviews (at McGill University)
13 April 2017 Fast-track Request to shift from MA to PhD. → v2. Refocus on Breathing Games. Question: How can co-created and freely adaptable games and devices for respiratory health help prevent, recognize, diagnose and treat chronic respiratory diseases at individual, local and international scales? How does the structure of the commons evolve over time? How does the experience of commoners evolve over time? How many individuals use the games/hardware and how (ludic experience, knowledge acquired, health practice)? What are the data gathered throughout the commons and how do they inform about health outcomes?
15 June 2017 Admission Admitted to the PhD.
05 Sep 2017 Conversion 3 of 19 MA credits recognized for the PhD.
Sept 2017 to March 2018 Coursework PhD

and research

  • Money, distributed data, and Commons
  • Distributed governance of health commons
  • University teaching: conception of a MOOC
  • Participatory research and games for health
  • Applied ethics
  • Applied mixed methods in health research (at McGill University)
  • Adv. mixed methods seminar health research (at McGill University)
  • Global health delivery (based on Harvard University course)
5 Oct 2020 Comprehensive exam Five questions on the growing presence of the commons in the dominant economic paradigm, problems related to the medical system, how health commons can address these issues; how to empower participants, and what methodologies help achieve positive outcomes. ▶ Chapters 3, 13
5 Nov 2020 Feedback Committee input on the comprehensive exam.
April 2018 to Feb 2021 Research
28 Feb 2021 Research proposal Summission of my research proposal. → v3. Review of the realizations done, connecting the dots. Thesis structured in three parts: Co-creation of libre games and controller for children with asthma; International deployment of a health commons; Large-scale cooperation. ▶ Chapters 4, 5, 6
Feedback Committee input on the research proposal.
March 2021 to

July 2021

Research v4. Inclusion of context and research journey. ▶ Chapters 1, 2
15 July 2021 Pre-submission 1 Thesis submission to the committee for review.
3 Aug 2021 Feedback Committee input on thesis.
Aug 2021 to Jan 2023 Research v5. Integration of the research journey chapter throughout the thesis. New critical reflection part building on ongoing articles. Inclusion of taking care together festival. Closing added. ▶ Chapters 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 14
8 Jan 2023 Pre-submission 2 Thesis submission to the committee for review.
27 Jan 2023 Feedback Committee input on thesis. → v6. Inclusion of captcha example, review of closing. ▶ Chapters 12, 15
11 Feb 2023 Submission Initial thesis submission to Concordia.
Feb 2023 to June 2023 Copyediting v7. Global review. Layout, illustrations, indexes and references were systematically corrected. Clarifications made. Chapter 9 completely restructured to clarify the model. Chapter 10 is no longer presented as an external publication. Synthesis in chapter 11 translated in English and updated. Six additional key figures added and other removed. Integration of the corrections requested in the defense.
29 June 2023 Defense
Aug 2023 ? Final submission Publication under CC BY-SA licence in editable LaTeX format.

Draft structure of defense

Version 1

Presentation of 20-30 minutes followed by questions of the examination committee and audience. Hybrid or in presence. Details.

Parts Time Detail
I. Scope 2 min Journey
  • Inspiration: A future where all humans could live decently
  • Experience of emergence
2 min Methodology
  • lively vs sclerotic research
  • creation-as-research definition / worldviews visual
  • six iterations (see above)
2 min Theory
  • commons and commoning definition
  • as a topic
  • as a process
II. Practice 4 min Breathing Games iterations
  • commoning across disciplines, territories, commons
III. Keys for solidarity 8 min
Barrier Mean Result Without
Loneliness, availability Short events Visible impact of action Effort too high
Material scarcity Libre philosophy Generative economy Value extracted
Power plays Emergence Teams of teams agreement Projects multiplication
Self-servitude Narratives New possibles No sovereignty
IV. Practice and model 4 min Open Village iterations

Value created

Potential impact: Captcha

Steps

Application

V. Closing 2 min Summary of learnings

Accessibility of thesis

Version 2

Parts Time Detail
Essence A method for people to solve human challenges by converging

What if we collectively had the capacity to overcome any crisis in a matter of days?

A method for teams of teams to:

– listen to each other,

– agree on priorities,

– put in commons resources,

– create few but essential and freely adaptable solutions.

Frame wicked problems, complexity

speed

Currently 2 min
Blue pill Red pill
belief
  • scarcity (material)
  • abundance (immaterial)
emotion
  • greed (lobha)
  • aversion (dosa)
  • ignorance (moha)
  • love (agape)
  • compassion
  • inner peace
driver
  • fear
  • fight
  • trust
  • mutual aid
knowledge model
  • forbidden (self-)knowledge
  • inhibition that prevent thought to unfold
  • disciplinarity (context-limited solutions)
  • introspection and interoception
  • freethought, giftedness
  • transdisciplinarity
identity / sense

making model

  • belonging to collective frame of reference prevails (phantasmatic fusion with the group), no matter whether the frame is incongruent or generates violence
  • congruence of own frame of reference prevails (singularity within the group), critical ability to question collective frames of reference
social model
  • I am better than (+/–), worse than (–/+), as bad as (–/–) the other
  • competition (universalism, my narrative)
  • control (top-down, systemic corruption)
  • I am as good as the other (+/+)
  • convergence (pluralism, cohabitation of narratives)
  • autonomy (self-organisation, sovereign regulation)
economic model
  • own performance
  • value extracted from the collective (negative externalities)
  • collective performance
  • value generated for / through the collective
legal model
  • state regulation
  • market competition (private innovation, WBS, IP)
  • "artificial intelligence"
  • libre commoning (glocal customs to share resources and regulate conflicts)
  • emergence
health model
  • allopathic medicine
  • focus on physical body
  • parts can be fixed with universal receipt
  • prescription from technical expert
  • holistic health and wellbeing
  • multidimensional human (body, mind, consciousness)
  • movement towards a dynamic equilibrium
  • listening to own subjective experience with peer support
Alternative
  • quality of cooperation first
  • value plural subjective experiences (cohabitation of knowledge systems)
Practice 4 min
  • Asthma: Breathing Games
  • Health: Open Village
Method
III. Keys for solidarity 8 min
Barrier Mean Result Without
Loneliness, availability Short events Visible impact of action Effort too high
Material scarcity Libre philosophy Generative economy Value extracted
Power plays Emergence Teams of teams agreement Projects multiplication
Self-servitude Narratives New possibles No sovereignty
2 min Method

Accessibility of thesis

Version 3

Approach to research

  • origins: transdisciplinary, leading agile development
  • socio-constructivist, traceable reasoning
  • seven iterations, creation-as-research (vortex)
  • autobiographical narrative

Question

  • How can thousands of people put in commons their resources to achieve collective wealth? / What if we collectively had the capacity to overcome any crisis in a matter of days?

Practice of commoning

  • Breathing Games (SNSF tables)
  • Hackathons (table)
  • Emerging Change

Concept of commoning

  • definitions

Finding 1: Key elements for solidarity-driven ecosystems

  • listen to each other
  • agree on priorities
  • put in commons resources
  • create few but essential and freely adaptable solutions

Findings 2: Patterns that impoverish or empower

survival (the ill tree) dynamic equilibrium (blooming forests)
.................................. .................................. .................................. .................................. .................................. .................................. .................................. ..................................
perceived / created scarcity

– misery (recognition, material, spiritual)

– exhaustion (self, resources)

– dis-eases, corruption (physical, ecosystems)

perceived / created abundance

– bliss

– vitality

– wellbeing (consciousness)

having / power plays (+/–, –/+, –/–)


fragmentation of (one's) Nature

– forbidden (self-)knowledge (mental health taboo)

– inhibition for thought to unfold

– disciplinary techniques (context-limited)


urge to control / exclude (fight, flight, freeze)

– universalism / one truth

– top-down (work-breakdown, AI)

– dependence


economic / ideological wars

– competing states

– competing corporations (IP)

– value extracted from the collective (externalities)


mastery of physical body

– allopathic medicine, fitness, fashion, ...

– body parts can be fixed with universal receipt

– prescription from technical experts

fear

greed, aversion, ignorance

(lobha, dosa, moha)


belonging to the collective narrative prevails,

whether it is incongruent or generates violence

(phantasmatic fusion with the group)

being / cooperation (+/+)


relatedness to our Nature

– introspection and interoception

– freethought, giftedness

– transdisciplinary creativity


awareness of interdependence

– cohabitation of plural realities (complexity)

– emergence, convergence (regulation)

– reliance, self-organization, sovereignty


commoning / commonization

– libre commons (bundles of rights)


– value generated for / through the collective


multidimensionnel consciousness

– critical public health, antigym, pers. growth

– sharing of subjective experiences

– movement towards a dynamic equilibrium

trust

love (agape), compassion, inner peace


congruence of own narrative prevails;

critical questioning of collective narratives

(singularity within the group)

Findings 3: Method

  • Method to tackle wicked problems within days
Barrier Mean Result Without
Loneliness, availability Short events Visible impact of action Effort too high
Material scarcity Libre philosophy Generative economy Value extracted
Power plays Emergence Teams of teams agreement Projects multiplication
Self-servitude Narratives New possibles No sovereignty

Practice of commoning

  • Makers (pres)
  • Open Village (brochure)

Acknlowedgements

  • Accessibility of thesis